🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, according to a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this trend has inadvertently benefited radical parties by validating their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Study Based on Two Decades of Media Coverage

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central subjects like integration and immigration, mainstream parties progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream groups were criticising the far right. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Across Europe

While the research was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect countries across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everybody starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published interview, a former German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be observed across Europe, as politicians from nations including the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a study author.

Some parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the radical right, even as studies suggests that this approach leads voters to vote for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered showed that the impact of far-right parties had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for established parties to carve out their own narratives, particularly on subjects such as immigration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be playing."